Knowledgebase
RackGeek Administration
| Posted by LISH-Josh, 05-26-2009, 05:56 PM | | Hey WHT!
We wanted to throw out some feedback on RACKGEEK system administration services.
One of our customers recently needed to break off one of their databases to its own dedicated SQL server. The time-line was too short for us to get behind so we knew we'd have to contract someone. We needed someone that had the knowledge and expertise for the entire migration - including final optimization of both web and SQL servers.
We decided to do some digging on WHT and see what kind of talent we could drum up. We chose not to put up a request; we picked each individual by their reviews and contacted them directly. We didn't want to just lay any vanilla server management company on this job - we wanted someone who fit our company so we could build a relationship for continuous work. After conversations and quasi interviews with several potential candidates, we chose RACKGEEK.
RACKGEEK was prompt, professional, and precise. He brought several years of experience in the industry and was very well priced. He signed our documentation promptly, started the job on time, kept us posted on his status, and provided full details of the outcome.
I've provided the final metrics below:
[Before]
Server Software: Apache/2.2.11
Server Hostname: **********.com
Server Port: 80
Document Path: /index.php
Document Length: 32572 bytes
Concurrency Level: 5
Time taken for tests: 15.812 seconds
Complete requests: 1000
Time per request: 79.060 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 15.812 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Queries: 2.5831s
[After]
Server Software: Apache/2.2.11
Server Hostname: **********.com
Server Port: 80
Document Path: /index.php
Document Length: 32494 bytes
Concurrency Level: 5
Time taken for tests: 7.090 seconds [Very Nice Change]
Complete requests: 1000
Time per request: 35.448 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 7.090 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)[/PHP]
Queries: 1.7585s
|
|
 Add to Favourites
 Print this Article
|
Also Read
